latest cases

Click here

SWEETBOY XOLANI KHUMALO v MEDIKREDIT INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD (LC). Summary: (Urgent application " requiring employer and group company to remain affiliated to medical scheme alternatively interdicting the employer parties from terminating the applicants membership of a medical scheme, pending either the outcome of a substantive application to be launched in the labour court or the determination of an unfair labour practice dispute to be referred to arbitration)

VUSI MALEBANA v SOUTH AFRICAN NUCLEAR ENERGY CORPORATION SOC LIMITED (LC). Summary: Suspension " Authority to suspend vested in the Acting Chief Executive Officer not invoked in the decision. Court will interfere in incomplete disciplinary proceedings if exceptional circumstance are shown.

JOHANNESBURG METROPOLITAN BUS SERVICES (SOC) LTD v DEMOCRATIC MUNICIPAL AND ALLIED WORKERS UNION (LC). Summary: (Urgent application strike interdict effect of non-compliance with s19 of Labour Relations Amendment Act whether demands part of settlement agreement regulating issues partial relief granted)

AMCU v SISONKE JABULA MINING (PTY) LTD (LC). Summary: (S 189A (13) application alleged failure to engage in meaningful consultation document detailing names, dates of employment occupations and packages of proposed retrenchees supplied as requested claim that consultation could not be properly conducted on a whole range of issues until list provided consultation on final selection of retrenchees unduly curtailed " limited issues outstanding limited procedural unfairness " limited compensation)

Latest Cases

M E NYAMANE v MEC: FREE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (LC). Summary: An application to review and set aside a decision not to approve re-instatement of the applicant who was deemed discharged by the operation of law. The requirements of good cause shown considered. The Labour Appeal Courts decision in MEC for the Department of Health Western Cape v Weder1 considered in line with what was said in De Villiers v Head of Department: Education Western Cape Province2 and applied. Held: (1) The review application is granted and the matter remitted to the first respondent. Held: (2) There is no order as to costs.

PREMIER MPUMALANGA PROVINCE v SHERIFF: JOHANNESBURG CENTRAL (LC) Application to recover money attached in terms of writ on the basis that (i) an application for leave to appeal suspended the judgment in terms of which the writ was issued (ii) an order made by agreement in terms of which the writ was stayed and (iii) the appeal succeeded. Court finding that (i) application for leave to appeal was lodged with the registrar outside the prescribed time limits and did not suspend the judgment (ii) the writ was stayed and not suspended and (iii) the causa for the writ was removed when the appeal succeeded. The first respondent is still in possession of the money and can be ordered to release the funds to the applicant. The second respondent took out the writ in terms of rule 45 of the Uniform Rules which provides it is done at her own risk. This includes the liability to pay interest if the judgment on which the writ is based is set aside on appeal.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE &RURAL DEVELOPMENT: LIMPOPO PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT v M.E. PHOOKO N. O (LC). Summary: An opposed review application where evidence was not led to show the alleged unfair conduct on the part of an employer, it is not possible to determine the question of fairness. In the absence of oral evidence, there must be a stated case, absence of which there is no arbitration. An award issued without hearing evidence is a nullity and it is susceptible to review. Held: (1) The award issued by the first respondent is hereby reviewed and set aside. (2) The dispute is remitted to the second respondent to be determined by another arbitrator other than the first respondent. (3) No order as to costs.

BYTES MANAGED SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD v CCMA (LC). Summary: (Review arbitrator failing to allow postponement for applicant to arrange legal representation. arbitrator failing to consider if appropriate cost award would have remedied prejudice to employee (obiter) arbitrator permitting advocate to appear without anything to suggest counsel had been briefed by an attorney also irregular)

LAGADIEN FADILA v MINISTER OF DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (LC). Summary: Points in limine of unreasonable delay and lack of jurisdiction where there are prescribed time periods, the common law principle of undue delay does not find application. The Labour Court retains jurisdiction where the referring party alleges automatically unfair dismissal. Until reviewed and set aside by a competent court, a ruling of the commissioner remains binding and effective. Held (1): The points in limine are not upheld. (2): No order as to costs.

1Case CA4/2013 delivered on 13 May 2014 (LAC).

2[2010] 31 ILJ 1377 (LC).

Latest News

Cosatu approves of new ANC MPs, but they 'will have to pull up their socks'

anc EWN reports that African National Congress (ANC) tripartite alliance partner Cosatu said on Tuesday it welcomed the new leadership in Parliament.  

Read more ...

Samwu 'notes' allegations of grand-scale looting of workers' strike fund

samwu thumb medium80 78 ANA reports that the SA Municipal Workers Union (Samwu) said on Tuesday that its leadership would be receiving a report of alleged grand-scale looting of the union's coffers as they were currently holding a scheduled central executive committee meeting.  

Read more ...

No injuries or fatalities reported in Germiston train fire on Tuesday

news News24Wire reports that no injuries or fatalities were reported after a train caught fire in Dinwiddie, Germiston, on Tuesday.  

Read more ...

Samwu slams appointment of David Tembe as acting JMPD head

JMPD The Star reports that the Johannesburg Metro Police Department (JMPD) has a new acting executive director of public safety following the appointment of its police chief David Tembe.  

Read more ...

Retrenchments constituted biggest share of Libertys monthly income claims in 2018

Liberty BusinessLive reports that retrenchments accounted for the biggest share of monthly income claims paid out by Liberty in the 2018 financial year.  

Read more ...

Lonmin plans to cut 4,100 workers as it closes platinum mines

lonminlogo thumb medium90 90 Bloomberg reports that Lonmin plans to cut 4,100 workers at mines that have run out of profitable ore and are being closed.  

Read more ...

Public Protector slates SA Weather Service for 'unlawful' appointment of manager with insufficient credentials

WeatherService TimesLIVE reports that the SA Weather Service (Saws) must approach the courts within 30 days to have the "unlawful" appointment of a manager with insufficient credentials set aside and take appropriate disciplinary action against suspended CEO Jerry Lengoasa for his improper conduct in the matter.  

Read more ...

Choppies CEO suspended amid legal and forensic investigations

Choppies Fin24 reports that following a meeting on Monday, the board of grocery retailer Choppies has suspended its CEO Ramachandran Ottapathu with effect from Wednesday, 22 May.  

Read more ...

Battle for control of Fawu could eat into the unions membership

fawu BusinessLive reports that the bruising battle for control of the Food and Allied Workers Union (Fawu) could spur rival unions to eat into its 126,000-strong membership in the farming, fast food, beverage, fishing, wholesale and retail, and hospitality sectors.  

Read more ...

Gas leak at Cape Town recycling company claims four lives on Tuesday

news News24 reports that four people died following a gas leak on Tuesday at a Cape Town plastic recycling company in Birch Road, Beaconvale, Parow.  

Read more ...

Well-known Labour Court judge dies after black mamba bite in Zambia

labourcourts News24 reports that a Cape Town Labour Court judge has died after he was bitten by a black mamba while on holiday in Zambia.  

Read more ...

Latest Cases

NUMSA OBO E MASANA v GILI PIPE IRRIGATION (PTY) LTD (LAC). Summary: Rescission application . Labour Court dismissing rescission application by employee. Labour Court holding the view that award prescribed and no prospects of success in rescission application . principles relating to prescription restated . Metrobus and Piemans Pantry decisions in Constitutional Court applied - On the facts, prescription had not run its full term; employees right of action had not prescribed . premise upon which application dismissed by Labour court incorrect - Appeal upheld and matter remitted to the Labour Court for consideration of the merits of the rescission application.

GOLDGRO (PTY) LTD v CAROLINE MCEVOY (LAC). Summary: Alleged Protected disclosure . employee contending that her retrenchment was due to the disclosure she made concerning certain irregularities to the board of which she is a member - the employee caused her attorney to send a letter (the PD letter) to the board concerning: (1) the integrity of the facility for coins held in safekeeping, (2) the integrity of the appellants stance on dealing with lessors to whom turnover rentals were owed, and (3) the merits of an application to place the appellant into business rescue.

GENET MINERAL PROCESSING (PTY) LTD v CCMA (LAC). Summary: Review of arbitration award . employee dismissed for negligently allowing blockage to occur thereby interrupting production at the plant which caused financial loss to the employer . There was a confusion about the dates when the blockage occurred . the wrong dates initially alleged - commissioner finding that no misconduct committed on the dates initially alleged and that dismissal unfair

TRANSPORT AND ALLIED WORKERS UNION OF SOUTH AFRICA v ALGOA BUS COMPANY (PTY) LIMITED (LAC). Summary: Condonation for the late filing of the notice of appeal and reinstatement of appeal . union contending that financial constraints limited its ability to brief counsel who will accept its payment condition . court held that an explanation based on the lack of funds will not automatically result in the granting of condonation and that explanation for the delay wholly unsatisfactory as union not providing financial statement proving its financial distress. Application for the reinstatement of the appeal dismissed and matter struck from the roll.

PIKITUP JOHANNESBURG (SOC) LIMITED v NEIGHBOUR EDWARD MUTERO (LAC). Summary: Enforcing arbitration award in terms of s158(1)(c) of the LRA . Labour Court making award an order of court reinstating employee in former position or any available executive positions and payment of bonuses . employer contending that as the result of the restructuring employees former position downgraded to that of General Management .held that employee was employed in an executive position prior to his dismissal and at the time of his reinstatement there were three vacant executive positions. So even if, as a result of the restructuring of the executive post which employee had occupied before his dismissal, it became impossible for him to be reinstated into that post, he was entitled to be reinstated into any of the other three vacant executive positions. As regards the payment of the bonuses ordered by the Labour Court, court held that payment of bonuses is discretionary and based on performance. Appeal partially upheld.

MACSTEEL TRADING WADEVILLE v FRANCOIS VAN DER MERWE N.O (LAC). Summary: Review of arbitration award . employer raising union undue delay in prosecuting the review application in its answering affidavit in the review application . Labour Court refusing to consider the undue delay because the employer had not filed a rule 11 application . court finding that by the time review was heard, the application had in effect lapsed and been archived in terms of Practice Manual of the Labour Court- as such the Labour Court had no jurisdiction and should have struck the matter from the roll or give the employer an opportunity to file a separate rule 11 application demonstrating why the matter should be dismissed or struck from the roll on the basis of undue delay. Appeal upheld with costs and Labour Courts judgment set aside.

WORKERSLIFE DIRECT (PTY) LTD v E MALOKA (LAC). Summary: Specific performance . employee claiming payment of post-employment commissions in terms of a Group Scheme Broker (GBS) contract after resigning . employee contending that he had concluded both an admin contract and a GSB contract with employer and that was entitled both to the benefits of an administrative employee and to the post-termination commission . employer contending that only GSB employees entitled to post-termination and targets commission and disputed the authenticity of the GSB contract - court finding that employee was paid on terms identical to those provided for in the GSB contract and that employee GBS contract probably authentic . Labour Courts judgment upheld and appeal dismissed with costs.

NKOMATI JOINT VENTURE v CCMA (LAC). Summary: Review of arbitration award . duty of commissioner to assist unrepresented litigants - employer contending that failure by the commissioner to lend a helping hand and to inform it that it was required to re-open its case and lead evidence in rebuttal of employees new version was a gross irregularity

NATIONAL COMMISSIONER OF THE SOUTH AFRICANPOLICE SERVICE v POPCRU obo A. MEZICHEL (LAC). Summary: Review of the disciplinary sanction imposed by employers appeal authority . appeal authority reversing sanction of dismissal against employee . court finding that appeal authoritys decision irrational and unreasonable in light of the employees conduct.

TELKOM SA LTD v THE COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION, MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION (LC). Summary: Jurisdiction of the CCMA to deal with an unfair labour practice dispute emanating from section 189 process. Section 186(2)(a) . failure to appoint the employee to a promotive position created consequent to restructuring and offered as an alternative to retrenchment. Interpretation of section 193(4) of the LRA . remedy of reinstatement and promotion of a retrenched employee.

Latest Article

The legal position on pre-suspension hearings has changed

For many years, we have advised employers who are about to suspend an employee on full remuneration to provide such employee with an opportunity to make representations on their proposed suspension. The Constitutional Court has on 19 February 2019 handed down judgment in the matter of Long v South African Breweries (Pty) Ltd and Others [2018] ZACC 7 finding that when an employer suspends an employee, there is no requirement to have a hearing prior to the suspension. Put differently, the legal position on pre-suspension hearings has now changed.

Background facts

Mr Long was employed by South African Breweries (Pty) Ltd (SAB) as its district manager for the Border District. One of his core responsibilities related to management of a fleet of company vehicles. In May 2013, one of these vehicles was involved in a fatal accident. It was subsequently discovered that the vehicle was not roadworthy and unlicensed. After an investigation by SAB, it was discovered that numerous vehicles, which Mr Long was responsible for, were not roadworthy and unlicensed. After a disciplinary hearing, Mr Long was dismissed for misconduct on the basis of dereliction of duties, gross negligence and brining the company name into disrepute. At the start of the investigation, Mr Long was suspended from work until his dismissal.

Mr Long subsequently instituted separate referrals to the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) - one relating to his suspension (prior to dismissal) and the other relating to dismissal.

On the suspension referral, the CCMA found that this constituted an unfair labour practice as Mr Long had not been given a hearing prior to suspension and that the suspension was unreasonably long. Mr Long was awarded compensation amounting to two months of his remuneration.

Pre-suspension hearings

One of the central questions before the Constitutional Court was whether an employer is required to hold a hearing before suspending an employee. The purpose of the hearing would be to allow the employee to make representations to ultimately convince an employer not suspend the employee.

The Labour Court found that an employer is not obliged to grant an employee the opportunity to a hearing prior to precautionary suspension. In order to ensure fairness, the suspension must be linked to a pending investigation and ultimately should be used by an employer as a measure to protect the integrity of that investigation. If the employee is suspended on full remuneration, this will mitigate any prejudice suffered by the employee. The Labour Court therefore held that the suspension of Mr Long did not amount to an unfair labour practice.

Ultimately, the Constitutional Court agreed with the Labour Court on this question. Where the employer suspends an employee as a precautionary measure, such an employee is not entitled to a pre-suspension hearing. In order to assess the fairness of a suspension, two considerations should be borne in mind:


  • Is there a fair reason for the suspension of the employee?



  • Will the suspension prejudice the employee concerned?

The Constitutional Court upheld the decision of the Labour Court. The fact that Mr Long did not receive a pre-suspension hearing did not amount to an unfair labour practice. The suspension was also held to be fair in that it was used to protect the integrity of the investigation. Mr Long was also suspended on full remuneration and, despite the length of the suspension, this mitigated any prejudice suffered by him

Workplace policies

Importantly, this judgment does not mean that suspension can be used as a form of discipline (i.e. suspension without pay or for unreasonably long periods of time). Employers are still required to ensure that investigations into alleged misconduct by employees are completed within a reasonable period of time.

Employers who currently provide for pre-suspension hearings in their workplace policies should consider amending such policies to align them with this judgment.


LRA Amendments 2018

Labour Relations Amendments May 2018 BCEA Amendment Bill 2017;

  • BCEA Memorandom of Objects;

  • Employment Services Act 2014;

  • Labour Relations Amendment Bill 2017;

  • LRA Memorandom of Objects;

  • National Minimum Wage Bill;

  • Impact Assessment.

    Click here to download the zipped files.">

  • Legislation Update

    New Minimum Wages: Wholesale & Retail, and Farm and Forestry Worker Sectors  

    New Minimum Wages: Wholesale and Retail Sector: 01 February 2018 to 31 January 2019

    Please follow the link to download the new minimum wages

    New Minimum Wages: Farm and Forestry workers Sectors: 01 March 2018 to 28 February 2019

    Please follow the link to download the new minimum wages

    Domestic Workers

    Domestic Workers Wage Increase

    The Minister of Labour, on 15 December 2017, gazetted new minimum wage rates for the Domestic Worker Sector effective from 1 January 2018.

    To view the amended wage schedules click here.

    Hospitality Sector

    Hospitality sector minimum wage for 2017/2018 by Lloyd Ramutloa -- last modified 2017-07-03 13:11 3 July 2017 The minimum wage for South Africa's vulnerable sector of hospitality has been revised upward with effect from 01 July 2017.

    The new Hospitality Sectoral Determination which governs minimum wage rate in the sector will be effective until 30 June 2018.

    The minimum rate for employers with 10 or less employees will be a monthly wage of R3 193.12 (2016/2017: R2 959.35); a weekly rate of R736.92 (2016/2017: R689.97); and an hourly rate of R16.36 (2016/2017: R15.17).

    The new wages for employers with more than 10 employees will be a minimum monthly rate of R3 559.10 (2016/2017: R3 298.52); a weekly rate of R821.34 (2016/2017: R761.25); and an hourly rate of R18.25 (2016/2017: R16.91).

    The latest increase was arrived at using the consumer price index of 6.4 percent plus 1.5 percent. The total increase is 7.9 percent.

    Minimum Wages Farm, Forestry 2017

    Wholesale & Retail Wage Increase


    Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act 130 of 1993, as amended

    Amendment of Schedule 4 of Act 130 of 1993 :
    Manner of calculating compensation
    GN 448 39931/15-04-2016
    Annual increases in medical tariffs for medical services providers
    GenN 256/GG 39955/26-04-2016
    GenN 257/GG 39956/26-04-2016
    Increase in monthly pensions
    GN 447/GG 39931/15-04-2016
    Increase of maximum amount of earnings on which the assessment of an employer shall be calculated
    GN 449/GG 39931/15-04-2016
    Rules, Forms and Particulars
    GN 444/GG 39928/15-04-2016

    Earnings threshold

    I, Mildred Nelisiwe Oliphant, Minister of Labour, in terms of Section 6(3) of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, No. 75 of 1997, (the Act), determine that all employees earning in excess of R205 433.30 (two hundred and five thousand, four hundred and thirtythree rand, thirty cents) per annum be excluded from sections 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17(2), 18(3) of the Act with effect from 1 July 2014.

    For the purposes of this notice:

    "Earnings" means the regular annual remuneration before deductions, i.e. income tax, pension, medical and similar payments but excluding similar payments (contributions) made by the employer in respect of the employee: Provided that subsistence and transport allowances received, achievement awards and payments for overtime worked shall not be regarded as remuneration for the purpose of this notice.



    STAATSKOERANT, 1 JULIE 2014 No. 37795 3

    This gazette is also available free online at