Legalinfo-Comprehensive & updated law libraries, auto suggest keywords, keyword highlighting and blazing fast searches
Legalinfo. South African Case law, Legislation, Labour Law. Search,libraries, Knowledge, ccma case law, Labour Court case law Legalinfo Menu


Submit



Tick the jurisdictions you wish to search below

  Constitutional Court      Supreme Court      Labour Court     Recent CCMA      All CCMA   Industrial Court      High Court      Legislation      Articles   

Submit Reset
Scroll down for the search results

Legal Information systems employment law, legislation, case law, CCMA arbitrations, Labour Court, Constitutional Court, Supreme Court

Legal Info is a comprehensive legal library and research service that puts updated libraries and powerful, blazing fast searching tools at your fingertips.


  • Comprehensive And Searchable Case Law, Legislation And Articles Databases
  • Supreme Court and Constitutional Court, Labour Court, Industrial Court and CCMA Cases
  • Bargaining Council Agreements, Wages and Sectoral Determinations
  • Regular Case Summaries, Articles, Whats New And Daily Newspaper Scans
  • A Blog for all updates and to bring like-minded people together and share insights
  • Newsletters, Subject Indexes And Advanced Searches With Auto Suggest Keywords

  • Latest News from the Blog

    Latest News Blog

    The coronavirus: implications for employers in South Africa

    by Johan Olivier, Kate Collier, Lizle Louw, Shane Johnson

    16 Mar 2020

    Introduction

    The Department of Health has confirmed the first case of the novel coronavirus (Covid-19) in South Africa. There is a strong likelihood that there will be other cases of Covid-19 across the country. Naturally, employers will need to bear in mind various employment and health & safety considerations to manage the risk of Covid-19 in the workplace.

    This article identifies the key legal considerations from an employment and health & safety perspective and provides advice on practical steps employers can take to safeguard employees. Please note that given the constant development of Covid-19, the answers to the questions detailed below will also develop.

    1. What is the coronavirus?

    The World Health Organisation (WHO) describes coronaviruses as a "family of viruses that cause illness ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases". At the end of 2019, a novel strain of the coronavirus (now known as Covid-19) broke out in Wuhan, China. Since the outbreak, the WHO has reported that there are over 98 000 confirmed cases of Covid-19 across almost 90 countries, including certain African countries (South Africa, Morocco, Tunisia, Senegal, Nigeria, Algeria and Egypt). To date, approximately 3 400 people have died after contracting Covid-19.

    At the end of January 2020, the WHO declared the outbreak of Covid-19 as a public health emergency of international concern.

    2. What are the common symptoms associated with Covid-19?

    Coid-19 is a highly transmissible illness. The symptoms of Covid-19 initially mimic the symptoms of the common cold. General symptoms of Covid-19 are associated with the respiratory system and they include a fever, coughing and shortness of breath.

    If left untreated or not treated correctly, infection can lead to pneumonia, severe acute respiratory syndrome, kidney failure and, in the worst case, death.

    3. From a health & safety perspective, what legal obligations does an employer have in light of the global outbreak of Covid-19?

    The Occupational Health and Safety Act 85 of 1993 places an express obligation on the employer to maintain a working environment that is safe and healthy. On the issue of a healthy working environment, the employer must ensure that the workplace is free from any risk to the health of its employees as far as it is reasonably practicable. Within the context of Covid-19, there is a clear obligation on the employer to manage the risk of contamination in the workplace.

    Practically, the employer can ensure a healthy working environment by ensuring that the workplace is clean and hygienic, promoting regular hand-washing by employees, promoting good respiratory hygiene by employees and keeping employees informed on developments related to Covid-19.

    4. What practical steps can an employer take to ensure that the workplace is safeguarded from Covid-19?

    As an initial step, the employer should conduct a comprehensive risk assessment to determine the likelihood of contamination in the workplace. This assessment should include a contingency and business continuity plan should there be an outbreak of the illness. At this stage, given that South Africa only has one confirmed case of Covid-19, the risk of contamination is low. 

    However, employers should consider the following proactive steps given the scale of the illness globally -

    • Follow health advice and information: the employer should follow health advice from the WHO (as an international source) and the Department of Health and the National Institute of Communicable Diseases (as local sources).

    • Communicate with employees: the employer should consistently provide updates on Covid-19 to employees and its approach at work regarding attendance and preventing the spread of infection. The employer may also wish to display posters that provide information on the illness and hygiene.

    • Prevent the spread of infection: the employer should consider that there are adequate facilities for employees to wash and/or sanitise their hands regularly within the workplace. If it becomes necessary, the employer may introduce a designated area in the workplace where employees may self-isolate if they experience symptoms whilst at work. The WHO has advised that, in countries where the illness has started spreading, employees with a mild cough or low-grade fever (37.3 or more) should be encouraged to stay at home and seek medical attention immediately.

    • Identify vulnerable workers: Covid-19 poses a greater risk to employees with weakened immune systems and long-term health conditions. Vulnerable workers include pregnant employees and disabled employees. Employers should pay special attention to such employees.

    • Update emergency contact information: employees should be required to review and update their emergency contact information.

    5. How should an employer manage employees who travel out of South Africa at this time?

    The employer should issue clear travel guidelines to its employees on international travel, particularly to countries affected by Covid-19. The employer should distinguish between employees travelling for business or personal reasons.

    Given the scale of the illness and if it is practical, the employer may elect to place a moratorium on business travel until such time as Covid-19 is contained. If this is not possible, a moratorium should be placed on business travel to affected countries.

    It may be more challenging to regulate personal/holiday travel by employees. Employees should be encouraged not to travel to affected countries. Importantly, employees who nevertheless choose do so should not be allowed to immediately return to work after such travel. Such employees should be required to self-isolate (compulsory quarantine) for at least 14 days. Employees should be informed that they must take all reasonable steps to avoid exposure to the illness which may mean cancelling or postponing international travel until Covid-19 is contained.

    The employer should also bear in mind that travel by employees to countries which are currently unaffected by Covid-19 could still pose a risk of infection as such countries may become affected at any time. In any event, at this stage, the risk of infection is high given the nature of travel, exposure to different people of different nationalities particularly on flights with multiple legs.

    It is advisable for employers to consider requesting all employees to disclose international travel (to all countries) undertaken by them (or any person who they live with) since 1 February 2020. This may assist the employer with its risk assessment to determine the likelihood of contamination in the workplace.

    6. If any employee is placed under quarantine by the employer, should the employee be required to take sick leave?

    If a medical doctor places an employee in quarantine, the employee should receive a medical certificate and in such circumstances, the employee will be on sick leave.

    In the case of compulsory quarantine (ie quarantine required and enforced by the employer), the employee will not be on sick leave unless a medical certificate has been issued to the employee placing the employee in quarantine. An employer may require an employee to be quarantined if the employee recently travelled to an affected country or if the employee displays symptoms of the illness whilst at work. The employer could consider such an employee to be on special paid leave away from the office (depending on the nature of the work performed by such an employee). As an alternative to placing the employee on any type of leave, the employer could make it possible for the employee to work from home. The employer may need to put certain measures in place or assist such an employee to work from home if that is the arrangement. If it is not possible for the employee to work from home, the employer will not be able to deduct the period of quarantine as sick leave or annual leave as it was made compulsory by the employer. This will be a form of special paid leave that is over and above any other type of leave.

    7. What if an employee requests self-quarantine?

    In the case of voluntary quarantine (ie quarantine at the request of the employee for precautionary purposes), the employee is not sick and therefore, sick leave should not be imposed. If employees are forced to take unpaid leave or annual leave in these circumstances, they may opt not to self-quarantine. We therefore recommend that this should also be treated as special paid leave. However, to the extent that the employee who requests self-quarantine can work from home, no leave will need to be awarded.

    The employer must carefully consider the circumstances under which special paid leave will be awarded to employees. These circumstances must be made clear to employees. It should be an option of last resort as it may be open to abuse by employees.

    If the illness spreads across South Africa, the reality for employers is that employees may request to be placed in quarantine to minimise their risk of infection. In this instance, the employer will need to consider implementing remote working for employees who can work from home. The guidelines above need to be applied to determine which form of leave will apply.

    8. What happens after the quarantine period?

    After the quarantine period and even if an employee does not display any symptoms, the employer may nevertheless require the employee to be tested by a medical practitioner and to provide the employer with a medical certificate confirming that the employee can return to work.

    9. What is a reasonable period of quarantine?

    The WHO has indicated that a person should be in quarantine for a period of at least 14 days.

    10. What if an employee contracts Covid-19?

    In such an instance, the employer should apply its sick leave policy to such an employee. The employee must obtain a medical certificate and any time out of the office will be considered as sick leave.

    Due to the nature of the illness, an employee with Covid-19 should not be permitted to return to work until that employee is cleared to do so by a medical practitioner.

    Conclusion

    In order to manage the risk of contamination effectively, employers should consider appointing an internal committee of professionals. The committee will be responsible for issues such as monitoring the spread of Covid-19, assessing the risk of contamination and taking measures to ensure that the workplace is healthy and safe. The committee should include representatives from the health & safety, human resources and risk and compliance departments of the employer.

    Despite only one confirmed case in South Africa, employers should act proactively within the context of Covid-19. Employers who are proactive will ensure that employees are protected and that business can continue to function as efficiently as possible.




    Fake qualifications can lead to large claims for damages

    Employers are increasingly finding that employees, particularly those in senior management roles, have misrepresented their expertise, skills, experience and most importantly their qualifications. To curb...

    by Thato Matloko and Neil Coetzer



    Similar fact evidence in arbitration proceedings

    The question as to what constitutes hearsay evidence and when it is admissible in arbitration proceedings in the CCMA or a bargaining council has been...

    by Carmen Abboy



    What are employee and employer rights and obligations in terms of sick leave in South Africa?

    Introduction The Basic Conditions of Employment Act, No 75 of 1997 the BCEA) gives effect to the right to fair labour practices referred to in section...

    by Fadia Arnold



    SAA wage dispute and strike

    Given the financial circumstances of SAA and the fact that the taxpayers of South Africa effectively subsidise SAA, the present stance of the recognised Unions...

    by Rod Harper



    The Big Catch: Theyve resigned. Can they compete with my company?

    So theyve resigned now what? Can the fiduciary duties as a director of a company extend post-resignation, and if so, to what extent? Are...

    by Antonia Pereira and Yaniv Kleitman



    Affirmative Action: Ten lessons learnt from recent case law

    The Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (EEA) was established to achieve equity in the workplace through the elimination of unfair discrimination and the implementation...

    by Hugo Pienaar and Sean Jamieson



    Legal connections get connected in labour court thanks to Sabinet

    Sabinet, a leader in facilitating access to online labour and legal information, offers free Wi-Fi access in all of South AfricaÃÆ'Į'ÃÆ'‚¢ÃÆ'ƒâ€Ã...¡ÃÆ'¢â€Ã...¡Ã‚¬ÃÆ'ƒâ€Ã...¡ÃÆ'¢â€Ã...¾Ã‚¢s Labour courts. This convenient...

    by Sabinet



    Visit the Blog here!

    Vicarious liability for data breaches Beware!

    With the commencement date of the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPI) fast approaching (it is expected to be proclaimed by the...

    by Era Gunning and Nicole Gabryk






    Latest Cases from the Blog

    Latest Cases Blog

    NUMSA OBO E MASANA v GILI PIPE IRRIGATION (PTY) LTD (LAC). Summary: Rescission application . Labour Court dismissing rescission application by employee. Labour Court holding the view that award prescribed and no prospects of success in rescission application . principles relating to prescription restated . Metrobus and Piemans Pantry decisions in Constitutional Court applied - On the facts, prescription had not run its full term; employees right of action had not prescribed . premise upon which application dismissed by Labour court incorrect - Appeal upheld and matter remitted to the Labour Court for consideration of the merits of the rescission application.

    GOLDGRO (PTY) LTD v CAROLINE MCEVOY (LAC). Summary: Alleged Protected disclosure . employee contending that her retrenchment was due to the disclosure she made concerning certain irregularities to the board of which she is a member - the employee caused her attorney to send a letter (the PD letter) to the board concerning: (1) the integrity of the facility for coins held in safekeeping, (2) the integrity of the appellants stance on dealing with lessors to whom turnover rentals were owed, and (3) the merits of an application to place the appellant into business rescue.

    GENET MINERAL PROCESSING (PTY) LTD v CCMA (LAC). Summary: Review of arbitration award . employee dismissed for negligently allowing blockage to occur thereby interrupting production at the plant which caused financial loss to the employer . There was a confusion about the dates when the blockage occurred . the wrong dates initially alleged - commissioner finding that no misconduct committed on the dates initially alleged and that dismissal unfair

    TRANSPORT AND ALLIED WORKERS UNION OF SOUTH AFRICA v ALGOA BUS COMPANY (PTY) LIMITED (LAC). Summary: Condonation for the late filing of the notice of appeal and reinstatement of appeal . union contending that financial constraints limited its ability to brief counsel who will accept its payment condition . court held that an explanation based on the lack of funds will not automatically result in the granting of condonation and that explanation for the delay wholly unsatisfactory as union not providing financial statement proving its financial distress. Application for the reinstatement of the appeal dismissed and matter struck from the roll.

    PIKITUP JOHANNESBURG (SOC) LIMITED v NEIGHBOUR EDWARD MUTERO (LAC). Summary: Enforcing arbitration award in terms of s158(1)(c) of the LRA . Labour Court making award an order of court reinstating employee in former position or any available executive positions and payment of bonuses . employer contending that as the result of the restructuring employees former position downgraded to that of General Management .held that employee was employed in an executive position prior to his dismissal and at the time of his reinstatement there were three vacant executive positions. So even if, as a result of the restructuring of the executive post which employee had occupied before his dismissal, it became impossible for him to be reinstated into that post, he was entitled to be reinstated into any of the other three vacant executive positions. As regards the payment of the bonuses ordered by the Labour Court, court held that payment of bonuses is discretionary and based on performance. Appeal partially upheld.

    MACSTEEL TRADING WADEVILLE v FRANCOIS VAN DER MERWE N.O (LAC). Summary: Review of arbitration award . employer raising union undue delay in prosecuting the review application in its answering affidavit in the review application . Labour Court refusing to consider the undue delay because the employer had not filed a rule 11 application . court finding that by the time review was heard, the application had in effect lapsed and been archived in terms of Practice Manual of the Labour Court- as such the Labour Court had no jurisdiction and should have struck the matter from the roll or give the employer an opportunity to file a separate rule 11 application demonstrating why the matter should be dismissed or struck from the roll on the basis of undue delay. Appeal upheld with costs and Labour Courts judgment set aside.

    WORKERSLIFE DIRECT (PTY) LTD v E MALOKA (LAC). Summary: Specific performance . employee claiming payment of post-employment commissions in terms of a Group Scheme Broker (GBS) contract after resigning . employee contending that he had concluded both an admin contract and a GSB contract with employer and that was entitled both to the benefits of an administrative employee and to the post-termination commission . employer contending that only GSB employees entitled to post-termination and targets commission and disputed the authenticity of the GSB contract - court finding that employee was paid on terms identical to those provided for in the GSB contract and that employee GBS contract probably authentic . Labour Courts judgment upheld and appeal dismissed with costs.

    NKOMATI JOINT VENTURE v CCMA (LAC). Summary: Review of arbitration award . duty of commissioner to assist unrepresented litigants - employer contending that failure by the commissioner to lend a helping hand and to inform it that it was required to re-open its case and lead evidence in rebuttal of employees new version was a gross irregularity

    NATIONAL COMMISSIONER OF THE SOUTH AFRICANPOLICE SERVICE v POPCRU obo A. MEZICHEL (LAC). Summary: Review of the disciplinary sanction imposed by employers appeal authority . appeal authority reversing sanction of dismissal against employee . court finding that appeal authoritys decision irrational and unreasonable in light of the employees conduct.

    TELKOM SA LTD v THE COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION, MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION (LC). Summary: Jurisdiction of the CCMA to deal with an unfair labour practice dispute emanating from section 189 process. Section 186(2)(a) . failure to appoint the employee to a promotive position created consequent to restructuring and offered as an alternative to retrenchment. Interpretation of section 193(4) of the LRA . remedy of reinstatement and promotion of a retrenched employee.



    Visit The Blog

    NUMSA obo MEMBERS First v SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS (SOC) LTD (IN BUSINESS RESCUE) (LC).Application to compel consultation and or follow a fair procedure in terms of section 189A (13) of the LRA. Parties are in dispute as to whether a dismissal has been contemplated within the meaning of the provisions of section 189 of the LRA. The issue whether the application was authorised within the contemplation of section 133 of the Companies Act not dealt with given the view taken at the end. Conclusions - a dismissal was not contemplated and the duty to consult did not arise. The procedure contemplated in section 189A (13) of the LRA is unavailable to the applicant. There is no basis to declare any action to be unlawful and to issue an injunction. Held (1): The application is dismissed. Held (2): There is no order as to costs.


    NASA-WORKERS v UNILIVER SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD (LC). Application to compel consultation and or follow a fair procedure in terms of section 189A (13) of the LRA. Employee offered and accepted an alternative position. Trade union insisting on consultation that ought to have happened in their view prior to offering an employee an alternative. The purpose of section 189A (13) is to ensure judicial management of the process with the sole purpose to ensure job security. Where job security is not threatened, there is no need for a court to judicial manage the process. Trade union having being told that the judicial management is not necessary is to be mulcted with costs. Held (1): The application is dismissed. Held (2): The Trade union to pay the costs of this application.

    NUPSAW v CCMA(LC). Summary: Review of an arbitration award; reliance by employee on section 198B of the LRA; whether fixed term contract had been novated, and if so, whether novation rebutted deeming provision in section 198B(5).


    ZEDA CAR LEASING (PTY) LTD T/A AVIS FLEET v SUSAN MARGARET VAN DYK (LC). Operational requirements- procedural unfairness - employer must follow a fair procedure in dismissing employee for operational requirements - failure to do so exposes the employer to pay a penalty in the form of a solatium - the determination of the quantum of compensation requires the court to apply a discretion taking into account the employees length of service- the anxiety suffered by the employee as a result of the employers action and the extent of the deviation from the procedure. Labour Court finding that employer failed to agree to selection method, upheld- court nevertheless reducing amount of compensation to 7 months remuneration and to the extent that Labour Court failed to consider employers payment above the legally required amount -“Appeal partially upheld but costs awarded to employee.


    MEC: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE v THE PHSDSBC (LC). Application to reinstate a lapsed review application. A party has an automatic right of review. The provision of the Practice Manual is not intended to take away that automatic right. Clause 11.2.7 of the Practice Manual requires archiving before an application is regarded as having lapsed. In terms of clause 16 of the Manual archiving is to be done by the Registrar of the Labour Court. Where no archiving has occurred, the application does lapse. Applications for reinstatement should be considered against the background of the automatic right of review. Held (1): The application is reinstated. Held (2): The late filing of the notice in terms of rule 7 A (8) is hereby condoned. Held (3): Directions issued. Held (4): No order as to costs.